Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parul Gossain


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is sourcing is insufficient Star   Mississippi  00:17, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Parul Gossain

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

BLP doesn't seem to meet WP:NBIO - coverage consists largely of WP:PASSING mentions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:16, 5 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:27, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I can’t find anything to support notability. Mccapra (talk) 06:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources are all quotes or interview (i.e. primary). KhinMoTi (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:33, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:34, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Provided sources are not good and I was not able to find anything else that is good. Fails notability. Pershkoviski (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom, brief mention sources doesn't pass the notability check. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:32, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'd say that the sources are ok, and that Gossain is mentioned in various books, like From Bombay to Bollywood: The Making of a Global Media Industry (also see here), Indian Cinema Through the Century, and other publications such as "From IndiaFM.com to Radio Ceylon: New media and the making of the Bombay film industry" (forthcoming publication), and some other scattered articles. From what I'm reading here, it appears that the other commenters here, and OP, did not do their due diligence to find at least some sources, as I found these sources pretty quickly.Historyday01 (talk) 03:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep As stated above, and in my opinion, she stands out for including reference to reputable sources. passes WP:BASIC. DYDK (talk) 05:21, 10 March 2023 (UTC) — DYDK (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - not sure why this was relisted once. Let alone twice.  Not nearly enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 17:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nowhere near enough coverage by WP:RS to satisfy WP:GNG. I agree that it seems there was already a consensus to delete before being relisted… I assumed there was perhaps a reason for this, and maybe everyone was missing some proof of notability out there, so I looked into the subject myself and simply confirmed that there is no realistic claim to notability. I would be more likely to support keeping the article if the subject were notable per WP:GNG. However, the subject isn’t notable and therefore doesn’t warrant an article per wiki guidelines. Shawn Teller (talk) 22:47, 26 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.