Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parul Shahi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to MTV_Roadies. (non-admin closure) — Theo polisme  00:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Parul Shahi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Single time reality show winner. No other notability. §§ §§ {T/C} 10:05, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to MTV_Roadies - From what I see, her only claim to fame was as a season 3 contestant for MTV Roadies and, considering there have been nearly ten seasons, it would be tedious to have articles for all of the winners and especially contestants where it would be countless. Naturally, Google News found mostly India-based news articles here (minor mention), here (minor mention, notes that she was rejected for season 2) and here (oldest article of them all, 2005, notes her season 2 attempt and talks about her duration with MTV Roadies). Whatever normal everyday job she has, it's probably non-notable. Like any India-related article, it is possible additional sources may not be English but I think they would probably be relevant to her MTV Roadies fame. SwisterTwister   talk  23:01, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  16:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)




 * redirect' per above. The source used in the article is a press release.  Everythuing else that I could find amoounted to a passing mention. -- Whpq (talk) 17:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.