Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parul Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:26, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Parul Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Disputed speedy, some claims on notability in article and quite few results on google. Is this worth keeping? No !vote from me, I want to see other's opinions. Peter 20:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. Silver  seren C 22:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. Silver  seren C 22:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added sources to the article. Please let me know if you disagree with any of them. Silver  seren C 22:37, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Keep. In consideration of the quantity and quality of the present sources, what purpose is served by continuing to leave this discussion open? Emily Jensen (talk) 01:38, 15 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep And you can not nominate an article for deletion, if you don't believe it should be deleted. Don't waste our time with this.  A well interviewed person is notable without question.   D r e a m Focus  23:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.