Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parul Sharma (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  06:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Parul Sharma (model)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG also Case of WP:TOOSOON and WP:BIO1E, She was crowned Peoples Choice Award at the Indian Princess 2015 and I can not find any significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources for a stand-alone article at least not yet.


 * Please note: The contents was replaced by an IP on 10 October 2016, see this revision also see my comment at this AfD. GSS (talk) 16:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage to pass GNG and even if there was, this would be a BLP1E. Looks like neither this Parul Sharma or the other Parul Sharma (Miss India-Canada) are notable. Btw, I pretty sure some kind of undisclosed paid editing is going on here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah must be some kind of undisclosed paid editing and sockpuppetry going on as per this revision and I still don't understand why they changed the contents of old article rather than creating a new one for this model I think because both models have the same name so they took advantage of it to fool NPP's. I have opened an SPI on these accounts please see this and this. GSS (talk) 05:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Sock-puppetry and COI is another issue. If you don't understand why page was overridden on already written 'Parul Sharma', maybe because of the same name have caused confusion or the editor didn't wanted to start page under 'Parul Sharma (model)' or 'Parul Sharma (Indian model)' title. Winning an award at national level beauty contest doesn't make biography 'notable'? 1900toni (talk) 07:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Parul Sharma (model) i don't understand why the complainer said that she is not find any singular independent coverage . please search on google "indian princess parul sharma" and then you will find at-least 10 and more articles about it which all are individual and not related to any private promotion . The pageant name is indian Princess . you can check the value of that pageant . it is telecast on  zee tv  .  zee tv  is biggest entertainment channel in India . please check  Chandni Sharma  also . she is the judge of that time in 2015 . it is big pageant which held from last so many years in India . it is the second biggest beauty pageant in India after Miss India .for credibility of that title here is my ref link ref and she is won that title by huge margin.after that various blog and beauty pageant news channel take her interview . hope that Wikipedia, check the all facts and then take the appropriate decision . Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by IndianPageantlCommunity (talk • contribs) GSS  (talk) 04:56, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — IndianPageantlCommunity (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Thanks   IndianPageantlCommunity (talk) 06:38, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep i dont understand why some user say its puppet user . i have interest in Bollywood, pageant , Indian models and fashion industry . it is my hobby . for me its like keep updating me , what is going on with our glamour industry . so thats why i keep checking on every pageant going on . yeah .. first i edit some articles which i have interest and then i edit this . before editing whatever i write , first i investigate about it on Google then i write it . i check all the references and media coverage .so whats wrong in it that if i write or edit in which i have interest and hobby . here is some other proof of about Indian Princess ,Chandni Sharma ,Audrey D'Silva , Parul Sharma (model) .   and i do not understand why these all articles came in deletion policy . all these girls are doing super good in her felid and they all come from the second best pageant in India , indian Princess and  you can also check Urvashi Rautela , she is the same girl which comes out from Indian Princess. here are some other ref also :-
 * Note I have struck the duplicate keep vote. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep She won an award at beauty contest Indian Princess 2015. As a finalist she is mentioned in a reliable news reference 1. 1900toni (talk) 07:17, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above links you provide are not indepentdent to the subject also wow.com is not a WP:RS. GSS (talk) 07:34, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * the above links are not cited in my comment. 1900toni (talk) 07:37, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * But this link was added by you which is not independent and it's same as IndianPageantlCommunity cited above. GSS (talk) 07:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * This one is independent but I think not notable enough as it is blog site. 1900toni (talk) 07:47, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NMODEL and WP:BIO. Just another of a billion non-notable model articles spammed here by an obvious sockpuppeteer. 51.9.185.43 (talk) 08:51, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I checked the sticker and going trough all reference. It is look like she definitely won that indian princess people's choice award . It is notebel work in modelling. I'm happy to know about her . 1.39.11.133 (talk) 10:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * — 1.39.11.133 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete Her modeling career is not enough to make her notable, nor is her participation in beauty pageants.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per IP 51.9.185.43 - "fails WP:NMODEL and WP:BIO. Just another of a billion non-notable model articles spammed here by an obvious sockpuppeteer" VViking Talk Edits 13:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.