Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep and Cleanup. Ryanjunk 15:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Paruthiyur Krishna Sastri

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is clearly not NPOV on grounds of religious bias - see Neutral_point_of_view. IMHO it is so heavily influenced throughout by a particular point of view that it is unsalvageable andy 22:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * weak keep when reduced to the essentials. What sort of additional information from another POV can you envision ought to be there?DGG 04:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It should have biog plus (ideally) a neutral discussion of the religious, historical and social significance of the subject. Plenty of examples in WP. But I can't see any of that info being safely extracted from the current text, so we'd be preserving a biased article in the hope that an appropriate expert would come along and totally rewrite it. andy 08:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * weak keep and stubify, no reason to delete that I see. Smmurphy(Talk) 04:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.