Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parvez family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Alex Shih (talk) 18:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Parvez family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original research, coatrack, you name it. Unencyclopedic set of "family of X" stuff created by a disruptive editor. I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail encyclopedic content as described:



Bundled AfD ☆ Bri (talk) 00:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete — Clearly original research, with no reliable sources to back up the claims. Also, the creator of these pages,, has been indefinitely blocked because of "Disruptive editing: Continuation of same behavior on a shocking scale, even after they were explicitly warned that they'd be indefinitely blocked if they kept it up" by . — Preceding unsigned comment added by SshibumXZ (talk • contribs) 00:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 03:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all: Wikipedia isn't a repository for family trees. MT TrainDiscuss 03:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 03:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 03:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete all because original research and limited signs of notability of the families.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all Material is promotional and non-encyclopedic.TH1980 (talk) 05:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete all - some of these might inadvertently be useful as anthroponymy pages, but they've been set up as family trees and the connections are not referenced. It's probably best to delete this walled garden and do it right, if at all; they would all need to be renamed anyway. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.