Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parvin Sultana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Parvin Sultana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a Bangladeshi physics professor. No indication whatsoever that she meets WP:GNG or WP:ACADEMIC, but A7 was declined. -- Finngall  talk  00:44, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- Finngall   talk  00:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Finngall   talk  00:48, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. As per nom. Nothing in the article to suggest notability of this person. I tried searching but couldn't find any coverage that would improve the article. Drchriswilliams (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable academic Seasider91 (talk) 15:43, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. She works at the top (and only good) engineering school in Bangladesh, but that's not enough by itself, and I don't see anything in her citation record or elsewhere that would give a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No RS and no claim of notability. Agricola44 (talk) 15:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG.     ~ Moheen    (talk)  19:00, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 11:02, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable academic with few publications. However, there is another Parvin Sultana working in the fisheries area who may pass WP:PROF. Recreation of the article to be about that person may be acceptable. -- 120.17.12.141 (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG .– Davey 2010 Talk 21:44, 10 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.