Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parviz Gharib-Afshar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Secret account 19:17, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Parviz Gharib-Afshar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article's subject doesn't meet the notability guideline. Additionally, copy editing from here, here etc... 115ash →(☏) 14:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  14:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 15:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 15:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete QUICKLY Copyright violation and he is not famous. 81.151.128.245 (talk) 18:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. While saying nothing on the notability issue, I would note that this article has been in existence for some while and that both of the links in the nomination go to sites which regularly copy material from Wikipedia. I don't think that copyright violation is an issue here. PWilkinson (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Userfication with instructions to author to provide inline citations to reliable sources. If the author has questions about whether a particular source is reliable, it can be asked at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. As it is currently written and sourced it fails the significant coverage test. Some of the claims seem dubious, or are at least badly stated, and as written are not supported by the existing references.  --Bejnar (talk) 05:01, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:35, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 20:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)




 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.