Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascual Candel Palazón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 15:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Pascual Candel Palazón

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notability of author-vanity fluff piece written by two SPAs which are likely sockpuppets of the author, and who removed properly placed speedy tags, so I am going through AfD. NN COI Vanispamicruft Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unlikely that they're sockpuppets of the OC, but yes, the subject is non-notable and the language sensationalistic in places. KaySL (talk) 15:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for above reasons plus quite POV sounding. Valley2 city ‽ 19:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:CREATIVE. Schuym1 (talk) 22:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The books are self published via lulu.com and none of the ISBNs are listed by Worldcat. Google searches find nothing remotely resembling a reliable source. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.