Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pasquerilla Spiritual Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 03:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Pasquerilla Spiritual Center
AfDs for this article:  – (View AfD) (View log) StateCollege 00:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see no notability, and it basically describes a new building complex on a university campus - and who contributed to its construction.  An aside, I'm concerned about the lack of reason in here. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 00:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: No assertion of notability. Just because it is there, doesn't mean it is notable. - Rjd0060 01:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete No assertion of notability. Unfortunately, it's not speedyable. So settle for regular old deletion for lack of notability  B figura  (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete University buildings need to have some architectural or historic or iconic or newsworthy element of notability. A university chapel could possibly have all four, but this does not seem to have any. If sources can be found, for example as prize winning architecture, it would be another matter. If notable events are held there in the future, that might also do it--and then a proper article can be written. DGG (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. A kind of WP:COATRACK for the "Center for Ethics and Religious Affairs", about which an article does not exist, AFAIK, or for the eponymous donors, ditto.  No assertion of notability, therefore doesn't meet WP:Notable.  Accounting4Taste 19:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Is the subject of secondary in depth coverage by reliable sources., the primary criterion of WP:NOTE and WP:ORG. --Oakshade 21:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.