Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pass Karado


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Pass Karado

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has been tagged as possibly not notable for a while. I had a look around, and while there are a couple of interviews on websites, I couldn't see anything that would pass the GNG, and there isn't evidence that there is a lot more out there. Based on the apparent status of the site, this seems unlikely to change any time soon. Bilby (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, apparently only one third party reference in WP:RS, and that's basically taking one of the founder's word for it. Nothing else is available in English-language web searches. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:27, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability found.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 12:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete- Technically this article is about a website which fails at basic notability criteria for inclusion of the web contents. Just found this trivial coverage on an English newspaper site, Times of India. (Non English reference within the article is not considered in my vote because it can not be copied and translated.) Hitro   talk  19:54, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.