Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Passionism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  Ty  02:51, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Passionism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no evidence of notability for this supposed art movement. This has been tagged for several months with no sources added to establish notability. May fall under WP:NEO.  freshacconci  speak to me  17:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   — freshacconci  speak to me  17:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete a whole load of problems with the article, including non-notabilty Dreamspy (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Delete Per above. ArcAngel (talk) 19:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A home-made art movement: and utter nonsense. Particularly ludicrous is the part about it being the first art movement "spearheaded" by women (excepting of course the Feminist art movement and collectives such as Guerilla Girls, or the prominent role of women at the inceptions of Dada, Performance Art and Post-minimalism).--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 19:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ethicoaestheticist.-- TreasuryTag talk contribs  19:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Johnbod (talk) 20:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Modernist (talk) 16:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.