Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Password Repository


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Neıl ☎  11:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Password Repository

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Patent advertising, written as such. Should probably have been speedily deleted on creation but as the article is getting on for 3 years old this seems inappropriate now. Has been tagged as needing citations since 2006 but none have been added. Ros0709 (talk) 13:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. It also appears to be a copy violation of pomola.com as there is some identical phrasing. Ros0709 (talk) 13:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I fixed that. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks; it no longer reads like an ad to me. I've also spotted there is a Category:Password_managers so there is probably no justification for deleting on advertising grounds. I guess the article stands or falls on notability now (per comment below). Ros0709 (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I don't see this meeting any of the speedy criteria (though I have no specific objection to the speedy deletion of an older article), but it doesn't meet notability guidelines. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3 years ago, we didn't have that speedy deletion criterion. Uncle G (talk) 13:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * What speedy deletion criterion? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Blatant advertising, the one that the nominator is talking about. Uncle G (talk) 13:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How come this friday afternoon feels like a monday morning? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:49, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It has been here for almost two years and there have been 10 edits (4 of which were a SmackBOT fix and the AfD itself). This is obviously not notable. Padillah (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.