Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Past Executives of the Students' Society of McGill University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. — FireFox • T [21:03, 10 April 2006]

Past Executives of the Students' Society of McGill University
Wikipedia isn't a directory or free web space. Delete Ardenn 02:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Feezo (Talk) 03:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Icarus 03:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mak (talk)  05:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to WikiStudentsSocietyofMcGillUniversity. Oh, there isn't one.  DELETE. NTK 05:15, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Move to Students' Society of McGill University/Past Executives. This page was created to alleviate clutter on the SSMU page, if that's a problem, perhaps it can be moved to a subpage of the main page? pm_shef 05:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. No vote for now. Here's my issues: first, what is the value of past executives of a student body, not a major university?  Second, I don't like subpages unless it is in userspace.   That is second because it's personal and not really of weight.  T   K   E  05:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * IMHO, it would be notable and merit inclusion in the main article if one of the current or former execs had done something outside of the SSMU, such as one of them going on to become Prime Minister, or one of them having participated in the Olympics, for example. Something that merits them having a Wikipedia article on their own. As a list though, it's not important or encyclopedic. They can post that on their own website. Ardenn 06:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 05:45, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, precisely as per NTK --Deville (Talk) 05:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong [[Image:Flag of Singapore.svg|30px]] 06:04, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete not at all notable and with no real prospect of becoming so MLA 08:30, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and as pm_shef has raised the matter, shouldn't SSMU be deleted as well?Markb 20:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Umm, no. There's extremely strong precedent for articles of Student Societies, all major Canadian Universities have them, plus SSMU has other claims to noteability in and of itself. pm_shef 21:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per nom and MLA. Joe 00:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.