Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Past Freddy Award nominations and recipients


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If the parent article is kept, please leave me a message and I'll consider undeleting for purposes of merging.  So Why  07:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Past Freddy Award nominations and recipients

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. While these awards are given out at what appears to be a large ceremony, I'm not convinced that having a large list of previous nominees and recipients is entirely worthwhile, as the awards are for high school theatre in a region of the US. This isn't, after all, a Grammy or Oscar BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, definitely not a notable award. Ajf773 (talk) 00:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)delete
 * Delete While I'm willing to consider the notability of the parent article for Alansohn (talk) 01:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, while I do wish to disclose that my high school was involved in the Freddy Awards and I created the article, I believe this article meets the general criteria guidelines (significant coverage has been shown through the success of the documentary about the awards "Most Valuable Player" and the widespread coverage its live program receives). I agree that the parent article is also notable but believe that this separate article is necessary because to merge the information contained within it into the parent article would significantly and non-constructively lengthen the parent article. To have that information available in a different article is much more appropriate.Daniel 02:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to The Freddy Awards - See my arguments for keep on that AFD page. If the decision there is to keep that page (which I believe it should, as that pages currently satisfies WP:N and WP:RS) then I believe this information should be preserved either as a standalone article, or as a part of the Freddy Awards page. I would think the former makes more sense, but either would make sense to me. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  18:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I nominated the parent article for deletion, the AfD is here: Articles for deletion/The Freddy Awards. Ajf773 (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- same as The Freddy Awards; a collection of nn subjects, fails WP:LISTN. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.