Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Past life healing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 10:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Past life healing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Spammish essay in violation of WP:NOR from who is trying to add similar things to Pastlife and Past life. Prod removed by author. JuJube 00:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as nonsensical original research. Mwelch 01:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as completely failing WP:ATT and also WP:NOT a how-to guide (in this case, how-to access memories of your past lives). Also I've categorised this debate as "Indiscernible or unclassifiable topic" =). Cheers, cab 00:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - as well as being utter nonsense, it's clearly just an OR essay. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  00:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unverified, maybe original research. I think this also violates CSDG1, (nonsense), according to template description. The Evil Clown Please review me! 00:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; vague, waffly and the epitome of unverifiable. -- Mithent 02:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unvertifiable, and utter nonsense, violation of NOR. Therefore, this article should be deleted anyways. Daniel5127 | Talk 02:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up between bong hits one day. — Krimpet (talk/review) 03:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete —  for - well, all of the reasons given above.  Philippe Beaudette 04:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsense how-to original research. Maxamegalon2000 05:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Past life regression which seems to be a marginally better article. Or some other one.  And perhaps a little better communication with the editor in question in order to help them contribute better to Wikipedia?  FrozenPurpleCube 05:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- OR, WP:NFT, also an essay.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 07:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As well as the issues raised above, NPOV comes into play, is there is no evidence that we live past lives etc. Bensmith53 08:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per FrozenPurpleCube. There's a fair bit of content in the article so I'd normally suggest some kind of merge, but since there are no sources cited the article is next to useless. Waggers 10:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No citations and is presented (badly) as fact. 87.86.171.130 11:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Scienter 14:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; Nonsense; essay; violates WP:NFT --Mhking 15:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsalvageable gibberish Irides centi  17:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research this is your brain on drugs.--Paloma Walker 17:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete total nonsense. Acalamari 18:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Er, this looks quite like OR and looks like it was made up in school one day. Not to mention the fact that it appears to be a how-to, which per WP:NOT does not belong on Wikipedia. — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 21:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the Brits would say, "Utter bollocks." Realkyhick 07:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Scientology as that religion is all about past life healing. SakotGrimshine 18:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - opinioning/OR has no place in wikipedia. --Strangnet 09:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Retainas it gives a totally different and most scientific explanation of past life. Till now people think of past life as a belief, but here you find it as a tangible reality that can be tested by anyone in lab like situations too.Rekhaa Kale 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Retain Those who are not willing to know the real truth about past life, may want this to be deleted. but then you will simply be killing the desire of new authors to contribute to wikipedia.Rekhaa Kale 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.