Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Bridson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Pat Bridson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The editor of a magazine that itself probably wouldn't survive an afd. One ref in the article, before showing nothing I can see. Tagged for notability since 2012. Szzuk (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. As the nominator did, I went seeking sources which might support WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. In honesty, and with every respect, while the subject's contributions to the relevant spheres (as editor, activist, politician, etc) may be documented in other/offline sources, I can find no evidence of that. Not to the extent that the subject is a primary topic of published (paper/offline) works at any rate. In the online sphere, the only sources I can find are this article and this one. Both of which seem to be published by the group/publication with which the subject was associated (ie. primary sources). And, while both of these support the claims in the article stub (subject was an editor and activist), they do not address the GNG/SIGCOV question. As the subject is not the primary topic in either piece of coverage. In short: delete. On GNG/SIGCOV grounds. Guliolopez (talk) 20:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Carn magazine. The reference in this article is independent of Carn and the Celtic League, and is not yet in the Carn article. Not enough independent coverage of her for an independent article. RebeccaGreen (talk) 00:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:25, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Like the Manx language, the Celtic League, and its magazine Carn, (which should probably be a REDIRECT to Celtic League,) Bridson gets very little press attention, almost no coverage at all, really, for Bridson.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.