Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Rolle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Pat Rolle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Missed the PROD in the history (thanks ) when I nominated, but the reason still holds: A Before indicates no evidence of notability per MUSIC or the GNG. He's had some engagements, but there's no significant, in depth coverage. Star  Mississippi  14:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  14:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - He was noticed by Billboard in 1969 as a local draw in his city, and that is a reliable source but not sufficiently significant beyond a basic introduction. He still gets occasional local gig announcements to this day. Good for him but that's not enough for an encyclopedic article here. Also note that all his media coverage mentions that he sounds just like someone more famous, which is not necessarily a compliment. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:35, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:57, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NMUSICIAN. No coverage that I was able to find that could be used to change my opinion Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 16:36, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources used here are not much reliable, does not follows all the norms.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.