Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patan Academy of Health Sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ⨹   19:49, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Patan Academy of Health Sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by WP:SPA, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Does appear to be an accredited degree-awarding institution, which we invariably keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:32, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 23:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as a degree awarding institution of higher education. Copyediting is the solution to the observed problems with the article, not deletion. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Its an accredited school that gives degrees, so it should be kept. This article needs to be edited to address its promotional problems, but this is not grounds for deletion. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES - Academy's are deemed notable, I'll admit it definitely needs work doing but that can be fixed anyday .– Davey 2010 •  (talk)  03:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep now. It was one massive copyright violation, but I believe I have removed all of the copyrighted material and the promotional tone.  There is not much left, but an article can be built on what remains. I am One of Many (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.