Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patari Haftanama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Patari.pk.  So Why  13:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Patari Haftanama

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not a notable record chart. cited sources are not RS. Saqib (talk) 05:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Literally the Patari.pk Weekly Top 20 should be enough to prove this chart exists. Not sure why you have such a problem with Pakistani wikipedia articles and members contributing to this website. If you spent this much energy is reporting sock puppets which are destroying History of Pakistan, then maybe people would take you more seriously. --PAKHIGHWAY (talk) 14:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You better comment on content, not on me. I don't know why you think I have got issues with Pakistani articles or contributors. Have you seen me carelessly nominating any other Pakistani article for deletion? anyways, this chart is not notable enough in my opinion to have a standalone page at the moment, so you need to prove otherwise. The article mentions only two sourced at the moment - one is primary and the other one is non-RS which doesn't convey notability. Why don't you take a look at the WP's criteria on Record charts . --Saqib (talk) 14:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Patari.pk article.  Greenbörg  (talk)  15:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.