Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patatu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Patatu

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neo-logism; vanity article Blowdart | talk 21:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Patent nonsense, NFT at best. Sgroupace (talk) 21:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang. P HARMBOY  ( TALK ) 21:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:DICDEF quite badly. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 23:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete — It's a WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. MuZemike  ( talk ) 23:40, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. What User:Pharmboy said. Seriously. Tadakuni (talk) 00:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and everybody else. A bad idea, badly done.  Urgh.  --Lockley (talk) 06:02, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources to verify. A quick google search doesn't confirm anything. Bill (talk 01:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:RS  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.