Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patch Kientz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Patch Kientz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable subject. Article created and updated by unregistered users with no relevant contribution. Completely fails WP:CREATIVE, at this point making it an advertisement. Btl (talk) 23:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp  | talk to me  23:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Perhaps could have been speedy deleted. freshacconcispeaktome 03:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not-notable -Hunting dog (talk) 08:34, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Also notice that the two sources cited in the article don't appear to meet WP:RS. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 14:12, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all - no assertion of notability. Johnbod (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.