Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patent1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete copyvio. Mind matrix  22:05, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Patent1

 * — (View AfD)

Clearing the CAT:CSD backlog, ran across this. WP:OR is not a valid speedy deletion reason. No stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 06:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is just a copy of the abstract of US Patent 5606474. Hence this is obvious original research. MER-C 08:26, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mer. yandman  08:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. WP:OR may not be a speedy reason but db-context certainly is! -- RHaworth 10:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as lacking context, and so tagged. In the alternate, delete as original research.-- danntm T C 17:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - copyvio. TerriersFan 19:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.