Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patent Lens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Non-admin closure. Notability demonstrated in discussion and new sources found. Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Patent Lens

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't prove notability Boleyn (talk) 21:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There's certainly some sources. It might be possible to merge to CAMBIA, but deletion would be wrong. --Colapeninsula (talk) 00:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep based on sources found. Bearian (talk) 22:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, good secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 12:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.