Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Path of Titans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 08:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Path of Titans

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The only significant coverage I could find from a reliable source was from Pocket Gamer, and this is their best article about it - every other one from them is just a short thing about the new updates. All other significant coverage is from random bloggy sites. QuietCicada - Talk 18:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada - Talk 18:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:TOOSOON or just not notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep I agree the news coverage on the updates is just routine coverage, but this independent review seems fairly detailed: . This French review looks detailed too, I found it on metacritic: . Since the listing it's also gotten coverage in a podcast from Rock Paper Shotgun here: . I haven't listened to it though, it's probably just five minutes coverage so I suppose it doesn't count for much. Darcyisverycute (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify and reexamine when the game comes out or a year from now, whichever comes first. For now, it's not ready for main namespace. Owen&times; &#9742;  17:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify, doesn't pass WP:GNG...yet. --Mika1h (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.