Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathpoint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Maybe one day, more sources can be found for this organization than are presently available. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Pathpoint

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage. Non-notable organization and the only reference is to its website. SL93 (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and California. SL93 (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 21:12, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I was leaning stub, since its WP:PROMO as is, but really can't find any coverage of the 50 plus year organization under this or the original name Work Training Programs Inc. Fails WP:GNG.Slywriter (talk) 23:59, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * do you have access to Newspapers.com? (If not, go ahead and apply for one at Wikipedia Library. You deserve it!) I'm finding enough there that it would take some time to review and sort through. Of course a lot of it is self-reporting on the part of the non-profit, but there appear to be feature articles that try to balance quotes from the organization with what people in the community say, and also compare and contrast to other similar organizations. (And of course this article as it currently stands is problematic and needs work.) Cielquiparle (talk) 09:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have access to Newspapers.com, but I didn't find anything that I thought would help. Though I could try to sort through it better later. SL93 (talk) 09:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.