Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathway Pharmaceuticals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 23:24, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Pathway Pharmaceuticals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject is a newly established "personalized medicine company" with no in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources. The reference attributed to Reuters is actually a press release not written by Reuters. Citobun (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Per nom. I am surprised this article was approved for article space. Delta13C (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:43, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable company. Reuters ref turns out to be a press release. Keeping articles about non-notable companies out of WP is difficult because of the vague wording of WP:CORP which seems to say that any two sources is enough to support notability. Unfortunately, it doens't say what the content of those sources should be, and financial news reports on every action by a company of any size, including routine reports about stock prices, mergers, and funding. We really must get a grip on this or WP will end up being nothing more than a company directory, since most of these companies are seeking SEO that is provided by having a WP article. We need a better definition of what makes a company notable. LaMona (talk) 06:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as there are a few links here and there, yes, but Seemingly nothing for a noticeably better article. SwisterTwister   talk  18:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.