Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patience (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Solitaire. Anything that's not in Solitaire worth merging can be done so from the history, as long as it's attributed. (non-admin closure) Steven   Zhang  Help resolve disputes! 07:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Patience (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:CONTENTFORK of solitaire. Originally was a redirect to the article. Games are identical so the difference in nomenclature can simply moved from this article to solitaire. Otherwise not notable. Curb Chain (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect again to Solitaire. The given references in the article can only prove that the game exists, which is not a good reason why the article should be kept.  smt cha hal  (talk) 07:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to solitaire. Terms are too similar in meaning to merit 2 articles. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - Wow, rather unbelievable how bad the article solitaire is. We've clearly got a content fork situation here; not so such which should be the redirect, however. Carrite (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge with solitaire as a content fork. I talked myself into it. This is the better piece and should be the bulk of the content. Solitaire should be the name of the article. Now, who wants to do the encyclopedia a solid by doing the actual work??? Carrite (talk) 02:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * "patience" in the context of card games is synonymous to solitaire. The article should not have been made when it was redirecting to that article.Curb Chain (talk) 13:10, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.