Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patmont Motor Werks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:38, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Patmont Motor Werks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced and promotional Rathfelder (talk) 15:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree entirely with Rathfelder. Beyond its own self-promotional Go-Ped website there are no other sources. It hasn't been peer-reviewed or coverage in the either the press or trade publications. And the article is written more like an advert than a neutral, dispassionate encyclopaedic entry. Pupsbunch (talk) 19:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Certainly a crappy article, but BEFORE shows the topic or its major product are quite possibly notable. Looking beyond the press releases, we DO have independent coverage:  (Italian)  and  for instance. UGLY articles need some love, and deletion of arguably notable topics is not love. Jus' sayin.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 22:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - I don't feel like taking the time, but there are numerous issues here. The article - under the current name - may not necessarily be notable. However, it is the creator of the Go-Ped which is notable. There was an article for Go-Ped which someone redirected into a disambiguation page . Quite a mess. Could be redirected into a page for Go-Ped with the content rewritten for that page. --CNMall41 (talk) 03:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's no consensus to actually improve the article to a better state and thus is best deleted for now until better is available. SwisterTwister   talk  04:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.