Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patraporn Wang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus herein is for deletion. NorthAmerica1000 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Patraporn Wang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I've declined a speedy A7 on this as I think it contains a possible claim to significance. I have little idea of the relative notability of different beauty contests, so I'm bringing this to the attentions of those that may know more. There doesn't seem to be an article about the contest referred to here, and I can't see anything much in the coverage of the subject that would seem to me to be a reliable independent source rather than a mention (she is widely reported to have joined others in a call for capital punishment for rapists, but that isn't coverage of her...). Peridon (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Sole claim of fame is as winner of an absolutely, completely, utterly, NON-NOTABLE pageant. Mabalu (talk) 20:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I like the understatement in that... Peridon (talk) 20:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - The person's only claims to notability are in connection with beauty pageants that have previously been discussed as non-notable. I do not see this subject as satisfying WP:BIO. Mz7 (talk) 20:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mz7. I originally listed this for Speedy because none of the other winners of this contest, nor the contest itself have been judged noteworthy enough to maintain a page, so this would have to fall under that category as well. -AMLNet49-Talk-Cont 00:38, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.