Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrice Pavis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Patrice Pavis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The only source I found that wasn't non-trivial I found was at the blacklisted suite101.com. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  00:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep A google book search or scholar search shows numerous sources proving that Pavis has "made significant impact in [his] scholarly discipline" as required by WP:ACADEMIC. He is the author of several highly cited academic works. I'll start adding these in, the article as stands is a stub, certainly, and has much room for improvement. - ManicSpider (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —ManicSpider (talk) 23:01, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Substantial presence on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep. I think that when a French academic affiliated with an English university gets significant coverage in one of the leading Argentine newspapers, it's a sign that he's notable. Also, more sources from Romania , Spain , Poland  (trivial coverage of him, but calling him a "renowned director"), etc. So as well as the pass of WP:PROF indicated by ManicSpider and Xxanthippe, I think there's a strong case for WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.