Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Altenbernd Johnson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:38, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Patricia Altenbernd Johnson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are no secondary sources, cannot establish notability. Manic Monk (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Manic Monk (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:49, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment. Although she has authored several books, I cannot find the reviews that would allow her to pass WP:AUTHOR through them. The best case for notability so far appears to be her "Distinguished Service Professor" title and WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Her position is not enough to meet prof notability 5, and we lack reviews of her text books.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. 's typical ignore-the-evidence-just-not-notable comment inspired me to look harder for sources and expand the article. I still didn't find any book reviews, but I found that she was given an endowed chair, that she was the first woman in the arts and sciences at her university to hold an endowed chair, and that she was president of an academic society (the Society for Philosophy of Religion). I think she passes both WP:PROF (for the endowed chair) and #C6 (for the society presidency). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein comments -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per David Eppstein, passes WP:NPROF. --hroest 18:26, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, and I added a review from Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews that includes a discussion of her writing. Beccaynr (talk) 02:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.