Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Byrne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Patricia Byrne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Patricia Byrne promoting Patricia Byrne and her books. Fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 12:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - self-advertisement about non-notable non-fiction writer, as obscure as most of us inkstained wretches. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  15:29, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:37, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - blatant self-promotion of a non-notable author. Snappy (talk) 15:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Question: I'm seeing some hits in Google Books where some of her writings are used as resources for books. I don't know how much that counts for, though. I did do a cleanup of the article, removing a lot of stuff that wasn't really sourced with stuff about her or her works as well as moving the two reviews I was able to find for one of her books currently up for AfD to this article.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)




 * Comment - Apparently a self bio which originally was spamming ISBN numbers for books written by the subject. When are we going to wake up and eliminate these commercial bar code numbers from Wikipedia? There is no legitimate, necessary reason for ISBN numbers at WP... Carrite (talk) 03:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.