Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Charache


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator withdrew nomination. (non-admin closure) Adam9007 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Patricia Charache

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While her husband has some degree of notability due to his treatment-altering research on sickle cell, I'm not convinced she rises to the level of having an encyclopedia article. Any career professor at a medical school will have hundreds of scholarly journals published; research and publication are part of the job. What makes her stand apart from them? I'm submitting request for deletion because I don't see it. thanks MartinezMD (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MartinezMD (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep. She meets WP:NACADEMIC, criterion 5, because she was a Distinguished Professor (in three departments no less) at Hopkins. She has the added recognition of a meeting room at Hopkins named for her. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Beyond #C5 above she meets WP:PROF with 22 papers listed on Google scholar as having more than 100 citations each. And why is it at all relevant to the nomination that she had a notable partner? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I somehow overlooked her distinguished status. My apologies to all involved and would request to withdraw this nomination. MartinezMD (talk) 16:20, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.