Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Fennell (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Patricia Fennell
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This person is not notable in PROF, their papers are not cited and they are not known RetroS1mone   talk  05:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It seems to me that she meets #4 of WP:PROF, "The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions" as she has worked on having her Fennell Four Phase Model started in educational institutions, as shown by the sources. Silver  seren C 06:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:08, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 07:09, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The Fennell phases that she originated are the subject of, and have been validated by a number of published studies in chronic fatigue syndrome and have been referenced in many other studies and publications. Note there are several different ways of referencing her work and I don't know how to pick them all up on the one Google scholar search I ran. Ward20 (talk)
 * Keep: Passes WP:PROF. Joe Chill (talk) 00:14, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Slam dunk delete, fails WP:PROF. Self-help businessperson with only one publication listed on PubMed, and she is the fifth of seven authors. MiRroar (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.