Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Kennedy (porn star)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Patricia Kennedy (porn star)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO. Not really much more to say David WS  (contribs)  01:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Even google images search with safe mode off is pretty safe.  If someone isn't spamming your name to show pics of you in the buff, you are not notable as a porn star.    D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 02:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - 270 pornos doesn't rate highly enough to be worth an article? If she appears for just 10 minutes in each one, that's 45 hours of sex. How many guys does a girl have to bonk before you guys will take her seriously? - Richard Cavell (talk) 03:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Enough for someone else to first write articles or books about her. Preferably twice or more.  Or she could just blow the president once.  It's about the quality, not the quantity.    D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 04:16, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. JJL (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 20:56, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete 0 relevant AVN, XBIZ article hits. Not on IMDB. Fails every notability standard that I can see, and may be a hoax.Horrorshowj (talk) 06:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.