Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Mainardi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   03:28, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Patricia Mainardi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I think she doesn't meet notability criteria. Melaen (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- I believe the subject is notable under WP:NAUTHOR. Here's one review of Art and Politics of the Second Empire, Yale University Press, by Mainardi:  link. Mainardi has written a number of other books, such as Husbands, Wives, and Lovers: Marriage and Its Discontents in Nineteenth-century France, also from Yale University Press. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Ordre des Palmes Académiques award together with the Charles Rufus Morey Book Award from the College Art Association (I added ref and info to the article about that one), and evidence that she has delivered prestigious named lecture series (e.g. this one here), has at least two journal editorships (I added info and refs), and the fact that she was a President of the Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art is already more than enough to pass WP:PROF without even digging further. Just makes one wish that scholars in humanities could put together their CVs as well and as effectively as, say, those in engineering. Would certainly make our life here a lot easier. Nsk92 (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - per prev two responders comments and impressive Google Scholar results. Gab4gab (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.