Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Moreira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Pass WP:GNG (non-admin closure) - Nahal (T) 07:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Patricia Moreira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a business person who is the MD of a large organisation but who does not appear to meet WP:N. Being head of a notable organisation is not of itself notable, and the only refs I found were either (a) primary, or (b) regarding an accusation of bullying in the workplace - a WP:1E, covered at Transparency International. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 20:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Leaning to a Keep; try one more re-list
 * Keep She is not a businessperson. She is an anti-corruption campaigner and the sort of person that businesses like to silence. I find her views widely quoted in reliable sources thus indicating that she satisfies the GNG rule. In addition to which she has been international recognised by two U.N. bodies as a board member of the United Nations Global Compact and a Council representative on the International Land Coalition. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm recusing myself from voting because page author notified me about this nomination on my talk page. I've added some citations to the page since the nomination; she's cited in lots of news coverage of various corruption scandals. So the interpretation of 1 event to me seems somewhat ambiguous, because although this is the first time she's been in the news for a scandal about her *personally,* she *also* is known as a spokesperson about corruption. It's not unusual for a single recent event (negative or otherwise) to push a person into sufficient notability to merit an article. Mvolz (talk) 11:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with comment and keep above. I see no advantage in deleting the article. Whispyhistory (talk) 14:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 10:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 09:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad rationale. She is notable with quite an enormous amount of coverage.  scope_creep Talk  11:45, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep She is not a businessperson, and heads up the largest NGO in its field. Enough coverage out there to pass WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. The article has been vastly improved. Bearian (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.