Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Ocampo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 07:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Patricia Ocampo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. She is heavily involved in a small local charity but that seems to be it. There's a lack of coverage about her in independent reliable sources. Articles qoute her but say next to nothing about her.
 * 1 Dead
 * 2 Some quotes from her, no depth of coverage about her
 * 3 Dead
 * 4 Quote from her, no depth of coverage about her. Does not verify the text it follows
 * 5 Quote from her, no depth of coverage about her. Does not verify the text it follows
 * 6 Some quotes from her, no depth of coverage about her. Does not verify the text it follows
 * 7 A promotion for the charity
 * 8 Dead
 * 9 Some quotes from her, no depth of coverage about her. Does not verify the text it follows

The dead links are local coverage that may or may not exist. The creator of this page, in this case using his Misty2011 account, has a history of faking verification, faking article titles, faking his identity, just straight out faking. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep A brief review of both the Spanish wiki and Google search show multiple articles on the subject who easily meets GNG. She does not have to be internationally famous to meet GNG notability, regional notability is sufficient. Article clearly needs work. Tone of nominator to original creator of article indicate there may be more going on here. Deletion of an article is not the proper venue for resolving a dispute over what appears to be an unsubstantiated character assassination. I have reworked the article. There are multiple external sources, all working links, which establish that she has assisted in the founding of 20 libraries in her province. SusunW (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Article has been vastly improved and individual clearly meets notability criteria. Also must note that creating 20 libraries in a nation like Argentina is a pretty significant achievement. As far as concerns about other editors who worked on the article early on, the various drama boards (ANI and the like) are the places to address editor behavior, not AfD pages.   Montanabw (talk)  21:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep sources reliable. Notability established. (Hablo Castellano)  Thanks to User:SusunW for the cleanup.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:59, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has been significantly improved since nomination, but I don't think this is really a case of WP:HEY because the pass of WP:GNG was already apparent in the nominated version. Nevertheless, thanks for all the improvements. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.