Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricide (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If those working on the content need the article history restire to user space, let me know... &mdash; Scientizzle 15:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Patricide (2007 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not assert notability, and the film does not appear to have received any significant coverage in reliable sources. PC78 (talk) 02:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm forced to agree, though I would love to be proved wrong, it sounds like an interesting film. Delete per nom. --John (talk) 02:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 02:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I took a look to see if the article can be sourced and improved, as it seems well written. I suppose finding notability is the first order of business. I do note that they have an Wiki-link to the wrong Charles Delaney... as the actor listed on Wiki died in 1969, and even his page here says so. They should have referenced this man. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 03:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The film is not listed in the Internet Movie Database yet, which suggests non-notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 *  Keep temporarily  I have created a sandbox for this article. Will work to improve it over the next couple days. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 06:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Yikes. A tough job. On my sandbox I have already done some major cleanup to the article, and certainly I can find numerous cites and sources for the history itself, as that moment in the timeline of WWII is of great import... but I am still digging to find out more about the film and its release. I have not given up yet! Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Addendum I have put out the request to the earliest contributors to this article as they may have links to the required sources inre: distribution, releases, reviews, etc. If I do not hear back... Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 00:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Nom's search link is illuminating and shows that this film hasn't received coverage from reliable secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 02:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no notable coverage, and not enough inherent notability otherwise. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 15:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. Changed my vote... and here I was 3 for 3. This one was tougher than expected. I will continue to work on the article in my sandbox and would like to be able to return it if/when I am able to show notability. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 05:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
 * A new development... I just received an email from the director of the film who tells me he will ask the film's producers why the film was never submitted to IMDb and further to provide me with the online evidences I requested. If I can prove notabilty, I will be glad to bring the article back, as the subject matter does indeed sound interesting. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.