Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Crowley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:36, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Patrick Crowley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Created with SPA Single Purpose Account "Sillystring575", does not meet general notability guidelines. Pro771189 (talk) 03:39, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I've trimmed back a fair bit of puffery, trivia and statements unsupported by their citations, although even with that I don't see a GNG pass here; the subject has been quoted in local media, but quotes from a subject explicitly cannot be used to support the notability of a subject. That being said, considering that this AfD is the sole Wikipedia activity of the nom, I wouldn't in his shoes make a point of pointing SPA fingers.   Ravenswing   15:20, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
 * delete as User:Ravenswing says, the nom is a SPA. Crowley is a political actor clearly disliked by the right wing.  That said, I can't source the "flight of the earls" claim reliably.  His only real claim to notability was being active in a labor union drive to elect candidates in a 2010 election.  There is noting in-depth.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.