Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Dylan Rich

Patrick Dylan Rich
We need some sort of new category to deal with this--not a speedy candidate, but obviously deletable. Vanity joke listing. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:04, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Of course it's a speedy candidate, and I've changed it accordingly -- to give a further couple of minutes consideration before it goes for good. Deb 17:12, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * I disagree. While clearly a delete candidate, I don't see what criteria at wp:csd this falls into. And the creeping expansion of speedy delete is something to be avoided. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:14, Oct 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * Agree on creepy-speedy, but this falls under patent nonsense: "physiciatrist", "green...and I'll second that". &#8212; Delete for sure, and I say Speedy. Bill 19:53, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * I also disagree about it being a speedy and I agree with [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]]. The criteria for speedies are and should be extremely narrow and should be adhered to punctiliously, because speedies are effectively actions a) by a single sysop that are b) not subject to review by anybody but sysops. Probably the most relevant category is Patent nonsense, and I don't think it is.
 * I disagree with both you and Meelar. There is nothing stopping a speedied article from being unspeedied, or even recreated with a talk page explaining why it shouldn't be speedied again, or whatever.  We are wasting time on nonsense like this.  Obvious jokes and pranks should be deleted.  -Vina 20:26, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * They should be deleted, but according to current policy as I read it, they are not speedy deletion candidates. If you think they should be, add "obvious jokes and pranks" to the list on Candidates for speedy deletion and see what people think about it. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:49, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Joke, prank, vanity, unverifiable. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 18:05, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Obvious joke. One more for my long mourned early deletion scheme.  Geogre 20:13, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a speedy to me under 3 different criteria (1,3,&4) of the policy in Candidates for speedy deletion.  Wolfman 04:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Speed deleted as patent nonsense. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:58, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)