Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Haseldine (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Patrick Haseldine
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor diplomat who had some temporary notoriety. Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Shocking point of view issues. The whole lead section is basically attacking him for an article he wrote and was sacked for. Delete per WP:BLP1E. Dysklyver  22:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment this is a WP:FRINGEBLP, his primary claim of notability appears to be promoting theories that South Africa was responsible for the Lockerbie bombing. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:BLP1E and WP:FRINGEBLP apply. And there is evidence to suggest WP:SPA editing in the article history. Edwardx (talk) 10:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete — there's quite a lot of mention of this man in material about the Lockerbie bombing, but he's not the main focus of any coverage and there's not enough detail about him in secondary sources to build a biographical article. Ralbegen (talk) 10:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.