Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick J. Lynch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. &mdash; Scientizzle 17:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Patrick J. Lynch

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

article fails to assert notability per WP:N, fails to provide outside sources per WP:V and reads like WP:SPAM. Mh29255 (talk) 01:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Author of influential, important published material  --Ryan Delaney talk 02:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep A mere Amazon search establishes that he is the author of several rather well-known books. Joshdboz (talk) 02:28, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Appears to satisfy the notability guideline for authors based on his published works. Wikidemo (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up - Certainly asserts notability, and appears to be in fact notable. Yes, it reads like spam, but that's not a reason to delete. Matchups (talk) 03:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article definitely needs work, but notability does not appear to be an issue. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:27, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - WBardwin (talk) 05:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  23:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 05:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.