Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lau Hing Tat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Patrick Lau Hing Tat

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable individual. Pepper Beast   (talk)  23:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG. No SIGCOV, most results on a search shows self-published resources. UphillAthlete (talk) 11:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Comment: Here are three sources I found about Patrick Lau Hing Tat :  The article notes: "A deep passion for biology and geography prompted Patrick Lau Hing-tat to take up landscape architecture. Now, chairman of landscape architectural firm Earthasia International (6128), Lau relishes his profession as it allows him to have a strong positive impact on the environment. Currently, there are only 100 licensed landscape architects in Hong Kong, making them an elite but unique group of professionals. ... He has been outspoken in the past about the environment, drawing the attention of senior officials in the government who then decided to tap his expertise. Lau is a member of the Town Planning Board and the Lands and Development Advisory Committee. In the past, he was a Eastern District Councillor and a member of the Harbourfront Commission."   The first source provides significant biographical coverage about the subject. The other two sources provide some biographical information about the subject in the context of interview material. Cunard (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)  Relisting comment: to discuss the sources Cunard provided and establish consensus Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  18:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * <p class="xfd_relist" style="margin:0 0 0 -1em;border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 2em;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * delete Article subject has some notability but I believe article fails WP:GNG. The sources that cunard commented still don't help the article's case much. GoldMiner24 (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.