Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Martinez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Patrick Martinez

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article has been here since 2006, and yet there's nothing to indicate what makes him notable. Woogee (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability, only assertations lead to red link. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - there is not even an allegation of notability. Bearian (talk) 03:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N. A search on Google turns up 9 out of 10 hits to people named Patrick Martinez who aren't him. BTW I did find a reference to the exhibition of Liquid at Parker's Box in 2003: . Yoninah (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete NN not ready for an encyclopedia...Modernist (talk) 23:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of meeting WP:N.  Ty  03:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't meet notability criteria.--Karljoos (talk) 15:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.