Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick McMullan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Needs work to improve it though. Tyrenius 23:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Patrick McMullan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Ignoring the fact that there are no reliable sources, the only claim to notability is the photographer having photos published in magazines and having written some books. Spellcast 18:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC) Spellcast 18:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A career photographer writing on his career... what next? Perhaps anyone with a career. --David Andréas 19:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete by using the criteria in WP:PROF, which is about academics, however applying the principles to this photographer. Whilst he has had photos published, there appears to be no awards, notable exhibitions or similar.--Mendors 22:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 *  Keep, Sorry boys I must disagree with you. I did google and yahoo search and plenty of stuff on him. All the article needs is some references attached. He is a notable photographer. Callelinea 17:29, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 23:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 *  Keep - I have to agree with Callelinea. The article needs some work, though.  Jauerback 16:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above and Ghits . Bearian 21:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per books etc Johnbod 01:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.