Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Nagle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Nagle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

GNG fail. Seems to be a coatrack article for the businesses. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom clearly fails WP:GNG.Celestina007 (talk) 03:02 21 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:56, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Patrick here. I'd to think I'm more notable and that my contribution to society are greater than half of the athletes published on Wikipedia. :) The page is useful for people who want to know who created RateMyProfessors.com into what it is today. In addition A LOT of people inquire about RateMyTeachers.com and wikipedia provides valuable direction as to the status of that project. Coatrack... meh, not really so. Rehab.com is helping over 8,000 people a day and I suspect you will be hearing much more about that project in the future. Between RateMyProfessors.com and RateMyteachers.com, these projects have reached over 500,000,000 people — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.249.230.2 (talk) 04:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Notability on Wikipedia is determined by external independent reporting on the subject. There is plenty of reporting on the two companies that Nagle bought, but not much at all on Nagle. So those companies have articles and Nagle probably won't, shortly, as there are not enough sources to establish notability. All I could find were items similar to this PRNewswire article, which we do not consider to be a reliable source. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't pass GNG. While RateMyProfessor.com is notable, Nagle himself is not. GPL93 (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.