Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Parisot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Patrick Parisot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BIO. There is no inherent notability for ambassadors. I could find no indepth coverage. He has a French namesake which comes up in coverage. LibStar (talk) 15:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  15:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. In-depth coverage is available. He's discussed throughout The Way It Works: Inside Ottawa (a national best-seller). I can also find coverage in The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, La Presse and Le Jour d'Algerie. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 16:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - ambassadors are not inherently notable and diplomats need to have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources to be considered notable. In this case, the coverage is more about his post-diplomatic career but that doesn't devalue the coverage. That reliable sources have considered it appropriate to track his career is sufficient for me.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 03:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.