Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Stull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Patrick Stull

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Artist with insufficient representations in collections. Legacypac (talk) 09:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 19:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ——Chalk19 (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources are inadequate to establish notability. Very little coverage availbale that is in depth and independent. Much of the article lacks sources. Looks like a promo piece.198.58.170.90 (talk) 05:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nomination. He isn't notable yet; maybe some time in the future if his work to come gets adequate attention. ——Chalk19 (talk) 17:26, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.